As I said later on ...."Or maybe more a bit like if you worked away from Home a lot due to your work and stayed in a company-funded apartment? "
It is not a "second home", it is an residence that allows a person to attend their remote office (in the case of MPs, that is Parliament) without a rediculous commute that would be totally impractical.
So where exactly should an MP stay, whose constituancy is in say Northern Ireland, or the Hebrides, or countless other places where it is not possible to travel from their home to attend parliament sessions and back again in a single day? Stay in a Hotel every night? I am sure moaners like you would complain about that.
I am sure there is a list of thosewho claim the license. So ***** what! they are allowed to under the rules, so they are not doing anything they are not allowed to. don't blame them, blame the system if you want to blame something.
I don't see a problem in the slightest with someone who has a job that means that are away from home for so long having accomodation provided which include a TV.
Put it this way.... These MPs are getting the TV license cost refunded for their Office - which all business do by putting it as a reclaimable expense, and are getting the TV license cost refunded in the accomdation they use when attending parliament - which business people would do in the same situation, but are no doubt buying a TV license for their own home - which is more than a lot of people on this thread seem to do, so all in all, I have more respect for those who pay out of their own pocket for 1/3rd of the license fee they should pay than the people here that pay ZERO of the license fee that THEY should pay.
SO before you say I should get my facts right, put your own in order.
someone compared not buying a TV license with breaking a speed limit. There is a big difference. Yes both are illegal, but going over a limit tends to be accidental and when noticed, speed is reduced. Knowingly not buying a TV License is far more akin to something like Shop lifting - a deliberate act of theft.
There was a comment about how someone doesn't like the policies of the BBC and that justifies not buying a license. THAT is like saying you don't like the policies of a certain shop so it is ok to steal from that shop.
"Plenty of info on the web" you say? The classic retort of those who cannot actually state what it is they are claiming and just pretend they so. Tell me precisely what I have missed. If I don't know I can hardly search for it can I?
I have had enough of this stupid debate and people complaining about one group while staunchly defending another who advocate blatent lawbreaking.
So in fact, actually don't bother tell me what I don't know, as I can't be arsed to continue this conversation with the likes of those who just want a moan and whinge about anything and everything
Last edited by wildebus; Yesterday at 11:25. Reason: removed some words as requested
Fed up with the Whingers and Moaners. PMs Turned Off. Sayonara
Parliament is only open 4 days a week - they could indeed stay in a Travel Lodge - what makes them any more important than my family who work long hours? Anyway, why do certain member on this forum become offensive, on the verge of being obnoxious, just because someone has a different point of view. Forums are representative of many different views an no one should be treated to offensive language because their view may be different from your own.
Put the MPs in a disused tower block if its good enough for the poor people.
I thought the BBC was strapped for cash until I saw tonight's repeat of top gear, they must have money to burn,
Last edited by harrow; Yesterday at 19:07.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)